| 1 |
- |
empty |
| 2 |
Site News |
text |
| 3 |
Mediagazer |
image |
| 4 |
memeorandum |
image |
| 5 |
WeSmirch |
image |
| 6 |
Newsletter |
text |
| 7 |
The Verge |
text |
| 8 |
- |
image |
| 9 |
Mark Zuckerberg says Facebook won't remove Trump's post on Minnesota protests to “enable as much expression as possible”, says it doesn't violate its policies |
text |
| 10 |
Daring Fireball |
text |
| 11 |
OneZero |
text |
| 12 |
BuzzFeed News |
text |
| 13 |
Politico |
text |
| 14 |
CNBC |
text |
| 15 |
Mercury News |
text |
| 16 |
CNET |
text |
| 17 |
Mark Zuckerberg |
text |
| 18 |
@donie |
text |
| 19 |
@teddyschleifer |
text |
| 20 |
@twittercomms |
text |
| 21 |
@mikeisaac |
text |
| 22 |
@scottjshapiro |
text |
| 23 |
@binarybits |
text |
| 24 |
@mikeisaac |
text |
| 25 |
@loudmouthjulia |
text |
| 26 |
@caseynewton |
text |
| 27 |
@ceciliakang |
text |
| 28 |
@etbrooking |
text |
| 29 |
@jyrkikasvi |
text |
| 30 |
@charlesarthur |
text |
| 31 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 32 |
@loudmouthjulia |
text |
| 33 |
@tayhatmaker |
text |
| 34 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 35 |
@denisewu |
text |
| 36 |
@joshconstine |
text |
| 37 |
@jimwaterson |
text |
| 38 |
@daringfireball |
text |
| 39 |
@zeynep |
text |
| 40 |
Daring Fireball |
text |
| 41 |
Zuckerberg Sticks With Trump |
text |
| 42 |
OneZero |
text |
| 43 |
What Happens When a Tech Company Makes an Enemy of the President |
text |
| 44 |
BuzzFeed News |
text |
| 45 |
Here's What You Can Say On Facebook That You Can't Say On Twitter |
text |
| 46 |
Politico |
text |
| 47 |
Zuckerberg: Facebook leaving up Trump's ‘shooting’ post |
text |
| 48 |
CNBC |
text |
| 49 |
Mark Zuckerberg says Trump's posts do not violate Facebook policy |
text |
| 50 |
Mercury News |
text |
| 51 |
Zuckerberg finally explains why Facebook is doing nothing about Trump's posts |
text |
| 52 |
CNET |
text |
| 53 |
Facebook's Zuckerberg will leave up ‘inflammatory’ Trump post about Minnesota protests |
text |
| 54 |
Mark Zuckerberg |
text |
| 55 |
This has been an incredibly tough week after a string of tough weeks. |
text |
| 56 |
@donie |
text |
| 57 |
“If anyone, including a politician, is saying things that can cause, that is calling for violence or could risk imminent physical harm.... we will take that content down.” Zuckerberg told @AOC a few months ago. https://www.cnn.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 58 |
@teddyschleifer |
text |
| 59 |
New Mark Zuckerberg post on Trump: “Personally, I have a visceral negative reaction to this kind of divisive and inflammatory rhetoric.” “But I'm responsible for reacting not just in my personal capacity but as the leader of an inst**ution committed to free expression.” https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 60 |
@twittercomms |
text |
| 61 |
We've taken action in the interest of preventing others from being inspired to commit violent acts, but have kept the Tweet on Twitter because it is important that the public still be able to see the Tweet given its relevance to ongoing matters of public importance. |
text |
| 62 |
@mikeisaac |
text |
| 63 |
here's his breakdown of how they dissected the President's post, and how they are in or not in line with FB's policies. https://www.facebook.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 64 |
@scottjshapiro |
text |
| 65 |
Regardless of where you stand on Facebook's content moderation policy, I hope we can all agree that Mark Zuckerberg is gross https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 66 |
@binarybits |
text |
| 67 |
Zuck is drawing the right distinction here IMO. Inciting private violence is categorically different from advocating violent government policies (including bad ones like shooting looters). It makes sense for social platforms to treat them differently. https://www.facebook.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 68 |
@mikeisaac |
text |
| 69 |
it's only been minutes but the majority of employee responses to Zuckerberg's decision thus far are....not very positive |
text |
| 70 |
@loudmouthjulia |
text |
| 71 |
“I know many people are upset that we've left the President's posts up, but our position is that we should enable as much expression as possible unless it will cause imminent risk of specific harms or dangers spelled out in clear policies.” Mmm. https://www.facebook.com/... |
text |
| 72 |
@caseynewton |
text |
| 73 |
Zuckerberg has decided that Facebook will not take any action against Trump's post about the Minnesota shootings, he just told employees and said in a public post https://www.theverge.com/... |
text |
| 74 |
@ceciliakang |
text |
| 75 |
Zuckerberg says he left up Trump's post b/c it was...news? “we decided to leave it up because the National Guard references meant we read it as a warning about state action, and we think people need to know if the government is planning to deploy force” https://www.facebook.com/... |
text |
| 76 |
@etbrooking |
text |
| 77 |
Zuckerberg's statement here is insufficient. Trump was not discussing national security issues; he was contemplating deadly force against American citizens ("THUGS") engaged in civil protest. Lest we forget, Facebook deplatformed Myanmar's military leaders***p in August 2018. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 78 |
@jyrkikasvi |
text |
| 79 |
Okay, is there any discussion, Zuckerberg would not want to discuss “as much as possible”? Like the best ways to brutalise Rohingyas in Myanmar... Well, at least he is consistent. https://www.theverge.com/... käyttäen @Verge |
text |
| 80 |
@charlesarthur |
text |
| 81 |
Interesting point that @gruber raises here: Zuckerberg testified to @aoc that he'd “take that content down” if a politician was calling for violence or could risk physical harm or [voter suppression]". Will she call him back for perjury? https://daringfireball.net/... |
text |
| 82 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 83 |
Here's Facebook's equivalent policy, which draws the line between posts about “state use of force” and incitements to nonstate violence. That's slightly more precise than Twitter's, although I suspect some of this is ex post facto justification. https://www.facebook.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 84 |
@loudmouthjulia |
text |
| 85 |
Disappointed in this seemingly being Facebook's response. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 86 |
@tayhatmaker |
text |
| 87 |
the mental contortions in zuck's post about why facebook is keeping trump's “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” post up are really something https://www.facebook.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 88 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 89 |
Interesting that the “most relevant” (as selected by Facebook) comments on Zuckerberg's post defending his decision all seem to lean a certain way https://www.facebook.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 90 |
@denisewu |
text |
| 91 |
Zuckerberg is complicit. Just like complicit Republican enablers. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 92 |
@joshconstine |
text |
| 93 |
This is such a straw man argument. Facebook doesn't have to take down Trump's post. Start by flagging them as inaccurate! https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 94 |
@jimwaterson |
text |
| 95 |
Zuckerberg decides not to remove from Facebook the same posts that got Trump censored on Twitter. He (and Facebook's lawyers?) says people should know if President is willing to use force. And unlike Twitter he doesn't read the posts as violent incitement. https://www.facebook.com/... |
text |
| 96 |
@daringfireball |
text |
| 97 |
Zuckerberg Cravenly Goes All-In on Trump https://daringfireball.net/... |
text |
| 98 |
@zeynep |
text |
| 99 |
The answer isnt in a close reading of Facebook's policies, but it's interests. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 100 |
The Verge |
text |
| 101 |
- |
image |
| 102 |
Leaked posts show Facebook's decision not to remove Trump's threat of violence is roiling employees, some of whom are calling on execs to reconsider the stance |
text |
| 103 |
CNN |
text |
| 104 |
New York Times |
text |
| 105 |
NBC News |
text |
| 106 |
CNET |
text |
| 107 |
@mikeisaac |
text |
| 108 |
@caseynewton |
text |
| 109 |
@oliverdarcy |
text |
| 110 |
@mikeisaac |
text |
| 111 |
@donie |
text |
| 112 |
@ananny |
text |
| 113 |
@nicdawes |
text |
| 114 |
@laurahuu |
text |
| 115 |
@danielpunka*** |
text |
| 116 |
@mattyglesias |
text |
| 117 |
@slpng_giants |
text |
| 118 |
@mikeisaac |
text |
| 119 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 120 |
@dylanbyers |
text |
| 121 |
@alexeheath |
text |
| 122 |
@clarajeffery |
text |
| 123 |
@monteiro |
text |
| 124 |
@aoc |
text |
| 125 |
@b_fung |
text |
| 126 |
@oneunderscore__ |
text |
| 127 |
@jasoncfry |
text |
| 128 |
@jeffbigham |
text |
| 129 |
@hshaban |
text |
| 130 |
@profgalloway |
text |
| 131 |
@matthewfederman |
text |
| 132 |
@arainert |
text |
| 133 |
@mollyjongfast |
text |
| 134 |
@jesselehrich |
text |
| 135 |
@jesselehrich |
text |
| 136 |
@ericschultz |
text |
| 137 |
@zeynep |
text |
| 138 |
CNN |
text |
| 139 |
Mark Zuckerberg silent as Trump uses Facebook and Instagram to threaten ‘looting’ will lead to ‘shooting’ |
text |
| 140 |
New York Times |
text |
| 141 |
By staying on the sidelines in the feud between Trump and Twitter, Zuckerberg could gain Republican allies to stave off regulatory intervention into Facebook |
text |
| 142 |
NBC News |
text |
| 143 |
Zuckerberg says he's ‘struggling’ with Trump's latest posts but leaving them up |
text |
| 144 |
CNET |
text |
| 145 |
Facebook employees reportedly criticize stance on not fact-checking Trump's posts |
text |
| 146 |
@mikeisaac |
text |
| 147 |
Twitter and Facebook have the same basic policies around voter suppression and incitement to violence, and trump posted the same stuff to both platforms. Some FB employees are beginning to wonder what line must be crossed for the company to act. https://www.nytimes.com/... |
text |
| 148 |
@caseynewton |
text |
| 149 |
Here's what employees are saying inside Facebook today about the company's decision not to take action against Trump's threatening posts: “History will not judge us kindly.” https://www.theverge.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 150 |
@oliverdarcy |
text |
| 151 |
Zuckerberg: “I know many people are upset that we've left the President's posts up, but our position is that we should enable as much expression as possible unless it will cause imminent risk of specific harms or dangers spelled out in clear policies.” https://www.facebook.com/... |
text |
| 152 |
@mikeisaac |
text |
| 153 |
it's this clip. employees are sharing this @AOC on the Zuckerberg all-hands Q&A stream in protest. it is not going well https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 154 |
@donie |
text |
| 155 |
Here's probably the reason we haven't heard from Facebook today. This is what Zuckerberg told Congress. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 156 |
@ananny |
text |
| 157 |
Facebook employees can't explain the company's contortions: “'Would it be possible to explain in more detail the interpretation of our community standards?' one employee asked. ‘Does this post violate them but get an exemption, or is it not violating?’” https://www.theverge.com/... |
text |
| 158 |
@nicdawes |
text |
| 159 |
Policy is necessary for getting this right, but the sufficient condition is leaders***p https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 160 |
@laurahuu |
text |
| 161 |
Leaked posts show Facebook employees asking the company to remove Trump's threat of violence: “If we fail the test case here, history will not judge us kindly” We can see they failed. https://www.theverge.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 162 |
@danielpunka*** |
text |
| 163 |
It's hard to quit your job in a time of crisis, but if you work for Facebook and have the flexibility to do so, it would send a message. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 164 |
@mattyglesias |
text |
| 165 |
In an April 22 scoop, Reuters reported that Facebook had secretly agreed to cooperate with the Vietnamese government in censoring content. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 166 |
@slpng_giants |
text |
| 167 |
It's not just users that have an issue with @Facebook's decision not to enforce their own policies on posts with threats of violence, it's their own employees. And it should be their customers, too. If you're advertising on @Facebook, vote with your dollars. You support them. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 168 |
@mikeisaac |
text |
| 169 |
Zuckerberg makes the call to keep POTUS' posts up inside Facebook so that people can see them for themselves, despite MZ's own “visceral negative reaction to this kind of divisive and inflammatory rhetoric.” https://www.facebook.com/... |
text |
| 170 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 171 |
A couple things here. 1) Monika Bickert is the Facebook exec who sat with colleague and misled Parliament in Feb 2018 as he stated emphatically Cambridge Analytica wouldn't have Facebook data one month before the world found out that was false. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 172 |
@dylanbyers |
text |
| 173 |
NEW Mark Zuckerberg: “I disagree strongly with how the President spoke... but I believe people should be able to see this for themselves, because ultimately accountability for those in positions of power can only happen when their speech is scrutinized...” https://www.facebook.com/... |
text |
| 174 |
@alexeheath |
text |
| 175 |
Mark Zuckerberg: “I know many people are upset that we've left the President's posts up, but our position is that we should enable as much expression as possible unless it will cause imminent risk of specific harms or dangers...” https://www.facebook.com/... |
text |
| 176 |
@clarajeffery |
text |
| 177 |
If you still work for Facebook...how do you rationalize it? https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 178 |
@monteiro |
text |
| 179 |
Another vichy headline from the @nytimes. Mark Zuckerberg didn't “keep Facebook out of it.” Giving the n****s harbor isn't a neutral stance. It's a complicit stance. Facebook is guilty from top to bottom. https://www.nytimes.com/... |
text |
| 180 |
@aoc |
text |
| 181 |
If you work at Facebook and are inside agitating for change, thank you. Don't let up. Our democracy and the safety of so many lives are in the balance. Workers can tip it for the better. Keep pus***ng everywhere. We see you. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 182 |
@b_fung |
text |
| 183 |
Mark Zuckerberg has a blog post defending Facebook's decision not to act against Trump's posts re: Minneapolis. Says he had a “visceral negative reaction” personally, but that he is the “leader of an inst**ution committed to free expression.” https://www.facebook.com/... |
text |
| 184 |
@oneunderscore__ |
text |
| 185 |
This wound up being a lie. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 186 |
@jasoncfry |
text |
| 187 |
History's been saying that for nearly four years now, fellas. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 188 |
@jeffbigham |
text |
| 189 |
zuck is sorry that trump incited violence but facebook has done nothing about it, even as twitter did something, ok?!? https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 190 |
@hshaban |
text |
| 191 |
Facebook the communications platform with billions of users and incomprehensible amplifying power is very clearly not the same thing as a billboard on the highway. And disinformation explodes the bad speech/good speech thing. But Zuckerberg benefits from this idealized conception https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 192 |
@profgalloway |
text |
| 193 |
“Many people in the tech industry believe regulators ... are the one existential risk to Mr. Zuckerberg's business.” Sure won't be his conscience. There isn't one. piece by @MikeIsaac @ceciliakang https://www.nytimes.com/... |
text |
| 194 |
@matthewfederman |
text |
| 195 |
History? The Present isn't judging them kindly. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 196 |
@arainert |
text |
| 197 |
“History will not judge us kindly” - FB employees... is a candidate for understatement of the decade. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 198 |
@mollyjongfast |
text |
| 199 |
Facebook really really really sucks https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 200 |
@jesselehrich |
text |
| 201 |
Leaked posts show Facebook employees asking the company to remove Trump's threat of violence “If we fail the test case here, history will not judge us kindly” https://www.theverge.com/... |
text |
| 202 |
@jesselehrich |
text |
| 203 |
FACEBOOK EMPLOYEE: “It's been said previously that inciting violence would cause a post to be removed. I too would like to know why the goals s***fted, and where they are now.” https://www.theverge.com/... |
text |
| 204 |
@ericschultz |
text |
| 205 |
If he's not going to be responsive to the country, wonder if he'll feel compelled to be responsive to his own team. Expect a lot more reporting on internal dissent. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 206 |
@zeynep |
text |
| 207 |
Facebook employees seem to not understand the company they are working for. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 208 |
Axios |
text |
| 209 |
- |
image |
| 210 |
Twitter determines two tweets about protesters from Trump and White House violate its rules on glorifying violence; users must click to see the labeled tweets |
text |
| 211 |
New York Times |
text |
| 212 |
Axios |
text |
| 213 |
NPR |
text |
| 214 |
The Guardian |
text |
| 215 |
Ars Technica |
text |
| 216 |
New York Times |
text |
| 217 |
Axios |
text |
| 218 |
Cointelegraph |
text |
| 219 |
Was***ngton Post |
text |
| 220 |
BuzzFeed News |
text |
| 221 |
The Atlantic |
text |
| 222 |
Wired |
text |
| 223 |
CNN |
text |
| 224 |
Bloomberg |
text |
| 225 |
BBC |
text |
| 226 |
The Daily Hodl |
text |
| 227 |
TechCrunch |
text |
| 228 |
Protocol |
text |
| 229 |
Politico |
text |
| 230 |
Trustnodes |
text |
| 231 |
TheStreet |
text |
| 232 |
@realdonaldtrump |
text |
| 233 |
@realdonaldtrump |
text |
| 234 |
@whitehouse |
text |
| 235 |
@twittercomms |
text |
| 236 |
@ajitpaifcc |
text |
| 237 |
@realdonaldtrump |
text |
| 238 |
@scavino45 |
text |
| 239 |
@whitehouse |
text |
| 240 |
@nytimes |
text |
| 241 |
@toddzwillich |
text |
| 242 |
@twittercomms |
text |
| 243 |
@whitehouse |
text |
| 244 |
@brendancarrfcc |
text |
| 245 |
@brendancarrfcc |
text |
| 246 |
@fransquishco |
text |
| 247 |
@npr |
text |
| 248 |
@donaldjtrumpjr |
text |
| 249 |
@tomwarren |
text |
| 250 |
@anthony |
text |
| 251 |
@ericbolling |
text |
| 252 |
@reckless |
text |
| 253 |
@jimwaterson |
text |
| 254 |
@orinkerr |
text |
| 255 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 256 |
@pranavdixit |
text |
| 257 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 258 |
@piersmorgan |
text |
| 259 |
@davidaxelrod |
text |
| 260 |
@hughhewitt |
text |
| 261 |
@chrismegerian |
text |
| 262 |
@sruhle |
text |
| 263 |
@jonlemire |
text |
| 264 |
@ow |
text |
| 265 |
@pbump |
text |
| 266 |
@orinkerr |
text |
| 267 |
@psythor |
text |
| 268 |
@alexia |
text |
| 269 |
@alexhern |
text |
| 270 |
@gruber |
text |
| 271 |
@jordanuhl |
text |
| 272 |
@rsg |
text |
| 273 |
@franklinleonard |
text |
| 274 |
@hshaban |
text |
| 275 |
New York Times |
text |
| 276 |
Twitter Had Been Drawing a Line for Months When Trump Crossed It |
text |
| 277 |
Axios |
text |
| 278 |
Trump forces Facebook and Twitter to take stances on free speech intervention |
text |
| 279 |
NPR |
text |
| 280 |
The History Behind ‘When The Looting Starts, The Shooting Starts’ |
text |
| 281 |
The Guardian |
text |
| 282 |
Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for ‘glorifying violence’ |
text |
| 283 |
Ars Technica |
text |
| 284 |
White House, Trump accounts both get Twitter rulebreaker warning |
text |
| 285 |
New York Times |
text |
| 286 |
Twitter Warns that Trump Tweet Could Spur Violence |
text |
| 287 |
Axios |
text |
| 288 |
Trump's big, empty beef with Twitter |
text |
| 289 |
Cointelegraph |
text |
| 290 |
Buterin and Winklevosses Address Twitter Censors***p Battle |
text |
| 291 |
Was***ngton Post |
text |
| 292 |
Gripped by disease, unemployment and outrage at the police, America plunges into crisis |
text |
| 293 |
BuzzFeed News |
text |
| 294 |
Mark Zuckerberg Explains Why Facebook Didn't Remove A Trump Post Suggesting Violence &h****ip; |
text |
| 295 |
The Atlantic |
text |
| 296 |
Trump's Looting Tweet Violates His Oath of Office |
text |
| 297 |
Wired |
text |
| 298 |
Trump's Tweets Force Twitter Into a High-Wire Act |
text |
| 299 |
CNN |
text |
| 300 |
Trump tweets threat that ‘looting’ will lead to ‘shooting.’ Twitter put a warning label on it |
text |
| 301 |
Bloomberg |
text |
| 302 |
Donald Trump Is Angry at Twitter, on Twitter. It's Great for Business |
text |
| 303 |
BBC |
text |
| 304 |
Tech Tent: Trump versus Twitter |
text |
| 305 |
The Daily Hodl |
text |
| 306 |
Under Pressure: Tech Giant Twitter Should Face Criminal Investigation by Treasury Secretary &h****ip; |
text |
| 307 |
TechCrunch |
text |
| 308 |
Daily Crunch: Trump takes aim at social media companies |
text |
| 309 |
Protocol |
text |
| 310 |
Trump pushes Twitter's buttons (again) |
text |
| 311 |
Politico |
text |
| 312 |
White House seizes on email as vindication in tussle with Twitter |
text |
| 313 |
Trustnodes |
text |
| 314 |
Search For Blockchain Media Intensifies After Twitter Censors The Whitehouse |
text |
| 315 |
TheStreet |
text |
| 316 |
Stock Market Today With Jim Cramer: Trump Talks China |
text |
| 317 |
@realdonaldtrump |
text |
| 318 |
....These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won't let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will a***ume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you! |
text |
| 319 |
@realdonaldtrump |
text |
| 320 |
I can't stand back & watch this happen to a great American City, Minneapolis. A total lack of leaders***p. Either the very weak Radical Left Mayor, Jacob Frey, get his act together and bring the City under control, or I will send in the National Guard & get the job done right..... |
text |
| 321 |
@whitehouse |
text |
| 322 |
“These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won't let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will a***ume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!” https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 323 |
@twittercomms |
text |
| 324 |
We have placed a public interest notice on this Tweet from @realdonaldtrump. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 325 |
@ajitpaifcc |
text |
| 326 |
Serious question for @Twitter: Do these tweets from Supreme Leader of Iran @khamenei_ir violate “Twitter Rules about glorifying violence”? https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 327 |
@realdonaldtrump |
text |
| 328 |
Twitter is doing nothing about all of the lies & propaganda being put out by China or the Radical Left Democrat Party. They have targeted Republicans, Conservatives & the President of the United States. Section 230 should be revoked by Congress. Until then, it will be regulated! |
text |
| 329 |
@scavino45 |
text |
| 330 |
Twitter is targeting the President of the United States 24/7, while turning their heads to protest organizers who are planning, plotting, and communicating their next moves daily on this very platform. Twitter is full of s**** - more and more people are beginning to get it. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 331 |
@whitehouse |
text |
| 332 |
The President did not glorify violence. He clearly condemned it. @Jack and Twitter's biased, bad-faith “fact-checkers” have made it clear: Twitter is a publisher, not a platform. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 333 |
@nytimes |
text |
| 334 |
Jack Dorsey had been up late on Thursday night speaking with executives when they were interrupted by President Trump's tweet: “When the looting starts, the shooting starts.” It was the culmination of months of debate inside Twitter. https://www.nytimes.com/... |
text |
| 335 |
@toddzwillich |
text |
| 336 |
“When the looting starts, the shooting starts,” is a threat coined by Miami Police Chief Walter Headley, who promised violent reprisals on black protesters in 1967. He also said: “We don't mind being accused of police brutality. They haven't seen anything yet.” https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 337 |
@twittercomms |
text |
| 338 |
This Tweet violates our policies regarding the glorification of violence based on the historical context of the last line, its connection to violence, and the risk it could inspire similar actions today. https://help.twitter.com/... |
text |
| 339 |
@whitehouse |
text |
| 340 |
Twitter, in an email to the White House moments ago, admitted that the very tweet they are censoring does not violate any Twitter rules. So why are they still censoring it? https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 341 |
@brendancarrfcc |
text |
| 342 |
Twitter's censors***p here doesn't even appear to fall within the policy it cites. Like any business, Twitter has a right to its views. And like any business, Twitter is accountable for meeting its terms of service. No business gets to violate those terms for political reasons. |
text |
| 343 |
@brendancarrfcc |
text |
| 344 |
Twitter has abandoned any attempt at a good faith application of its rules. No one should take comfort in that. Here it is punis***ng speakers based on whether it approves or disapproves of their politics. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 345 |
@fransquishco |
text |
| 346 |
ICYMI, the “looting / shooting” remark is a phrase from the 1960s borrowed from segregationists like George Wallace and Eugene Connor, as well as racist police chief Walter Headley who used shotguns and dogs against unrest in black neighborhoods. https://www.npr.org/... |
text |
| 347 |
@npr |
text |
| 348 |
The phrase President Trump tweeted goes back to the Civil Rights Era. It was used by a white police chief with “a long history of bigotry against the black community,” a scholar explains. And a segregationist politician. https://www.npr.org/... |
text |
| 349 |
@donaldjtrumpjr |
text |
| 350 |
Because they're leftist hacks trying to manip****te an election... and they're also full of c****. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 351 |
@tomwarren |
text |
| 352 |
just ban him already 🙄 https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 353 |
@anthony |
text |
| 354 |
The historical context of Trump's use of “when the looting starts, the shooting starts.” https://www.wsj.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 355 |
@ericbolling |
text |
| 356 |
Fact check this @Twitter: As a @twitter stockholder, I am dumping my shares today. Rationale: New fact check policy opens #Twitter up to countless lawsuits over erroneous fact-checking and for biased fact-checking. What a can of worms @Jack is opening.. #SellingTwitterStock https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 357 |
@reckless |
text |
| 358 |
Every single argument being made by conservatives about Twitter moderation is an argument they rejected about ISP blocking and throttling in the net neutrality debate. My head hurts |
text |
| 359 |
@jimwaterson |
text |
| 360 |
There's literally no way to win against bad faith actions. People like you and me quote tweeting this with an exasperated comment is the aim. Ignoring it isn't possible. And decision by Twitter to hide it isn't hiding it, it's instead amplifying each tweet on a ma***ive scale. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 361 |
@orinkerr |
text |
| 362 |
Trump doesn't care at all about the Const**ution, of course, especially when he's trying to scare voters. But actually following a policy of “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” would violate the 4th Amendment, for starters. See Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 363 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 364 |
And here is the White House official account now with the same tweet labeled serving a notice from Twitter. It's hard to believe Twitter isn't on strong legal ground to do this. That said, the other tech platforms should be supporting Twitter in this right. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 365 |
@pranavdixit |
text |
| 366 |
Twitter just confirmed to @BuzzFeedNews that they put a warning label on the tweets by Trump and the White House based on the historical context of the last line. In 1967, Miami Police Chief Walter Headley used the line to describe his approach to protests in black neighborhoods. https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 367 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 368 |
interesting. not sure our agency commissioners should be diving in real-time. I believe this FCC tweet, shared by White House no less, muddies situation especially w Griffin comparison. Her tweet was removed, IOW Twitter took action. The remaining tweet is a news report about it. https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 369 |
@piersmorgan |
text |
| 370 |
The White House is officially endorsing the President's threat to shoot Americans. This is absolutely disgraceful. 👇 https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 371 |
@davidaxelrod |
text |
| 372 |
You might ask if this really is the time to cheap shot the mayor of a shaken city & threaten more violence? It is if your MO is to inflame and exploit any crisis for your own perceived political advantage. You see tragedy. He sees opportunity. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 373 |
@hughhewitt |
text |
| 374 |
This is proof that @Jack checks in from his island annually, and did so on Wednesday then left for the year, leaving George Costanza in charge: https://www.wsj.com/... |
text |
| 375 |
@chrismegerian |
text |
| 376 |
Apart from the profanity, why is a White House advisor criticizing a technology platform for allowing protestors to organize? That seems to fall under freedom of a***embly. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 377 |
@sruhle |
text |
| 378 |
With all due respect @DanScavino, If @Twitter is so terrible, stop using it. @realDonaldTrump has the ability to reach the public using many other platforms. & he can always accept our invitations for interviews. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 379 |
@jonlemire |
text |
| 380 |
And now the official White House account reposts the president's tweet that was flagged by Twitter for promoting violence https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 381 |
@ow |
text |
| 382 |
Twitter has finally done the bare minimum after years of condoning these types of tweets. Wild to see Twitter do this while Mark Zuckerberg is saying Facebook shouldn't have to do anything at all. https://www.theguardian.com/ ... |
text |
| 383 |
@pbump |
text |
| 384 |
Late Wednesday night: Trump elevates a tweet in which a man says that the only good Democrat is a dead one. Late Thursday night: Trump endorses shooting people who commit property damage. Uh, stay tuned, I guess. |
text |
| 385 |
@orinkerr |
text |
| 386 |
(1) President: Let's shoot looters. (2) Twitter: That violates our terms of service, so we'll put up a warning. It's fascinating to see who thinks the big story is (1) and who thinks the big story is (2). |
text |
| 387 |
@psythor |
text |
| 388 |
There is always a tweet! https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 389 |
@alexia |
text |
| 390 |
Wow. Go @jack https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 391 |
@alexhern |
text |
| 392 |
this only ends with Twitter banning Trump and I wonder if Twitter can see that |
text |
| 393 |
@gruber |
text |
| 394 |
If Twitter has a plan here it's to slowly drive Trump over the edge tweet but tweet. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 395 |
@jordanuhl |
text |
| 396 |
twitter has a stronger punishment for the guy who pretended to be a Starbucks manager and said he wouldn't let employees say merry christmas than it does for trump tweeting about instructing the military to ma***acre people. pretty great |
text |
| 397 |
@rsg |
text |
| 398 |
Amazing leaders***p from @jack. Standing up for what's right. Standing up against Trump's bigotry & hate-mongering—with the entire company on the line. Thank you. ♥️ https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 399 |
@franklinleonard |
text |
| 400 |
Is it someone's job to wake him up to inform him that this happened or do they just wait until he wakes up in the morning and sees it? https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 401 |
@hshaban |
text |
| 402 |
— Trump threatens to call the National Guard and says “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” — Twitter places a “public interest notice” on Trump's tweet, so users have to click _View_ to see it. — Users can't like reply or retweet it, but can retweet with comment https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 403 |
Axios |
text |
| 404 |
Sen. Ted Cruz calls for criminal investigation of Twitter, alleging it is violating US sanctions against Iran by letting Iranian leaders maintain accounts |
text |
| 405 |
Business Insider |
text |
| 406 |
The Verge |
text |
| 407 |
@michaelschweitz |
text |
| 408 |
@neednewshorts |
text |
| 409 |
@ericgarland |
text |
| 410 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 411 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 412 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 413 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 414 |
@tedcruz |
text |
| 415 |
Business Insider |
text |
| 416 |
Sen. Ted Cruz demands a federal investigation into Twitter, claiming it's violating US sanctions &h****ip; |
text |
| 417 |
The Verge |
text |
| 418 |
Ted Cruz wants Twitter investigated over Iran sanctions compliance |
text |
| 419 |
@michaelschweitz |
text |
| 420 |
Ted, I grow the weirdest face hair, Cruz, uses twitter to tweet that he wants a criminal investigation of Twitter. 😂 https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 421 |
@neednewshorts |
text |
| 422 |
🤣🤣 oh man, this is the funniest thing I've seen all day. Thank you for this laugh, Ted. I needed it https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 423 |
@ericgarland |
text |
| 424 |
BREAKING: Guy who spent the same amount with Russian intelligence front Cambridge Analytica as Trump wants to investigate tech company he also manip****ted! https://www.axios.com/... |
text |
| 425 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 426 |
To be clear, Twitter declined to comment directly on the Khamenei tweets, aside from providing that context—which implies that the company also did not rule out taking action on them. |
text |
| 427 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 428 |
Anyone tempted to take Pai's “what about Khamenei” critique seriously should probably acknowledge that Twitter has also not taken action on Trump tweets implicitly threatening violence as a matter of foreign policy, such as this one from 2018: https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 429 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 430 |
Here's the guideline covering foreign policy tweets by world leaders, from a blog post Twitter published in October 2019: https://blog.twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 431 |
@willoremus |
text |
| 432 |
I asked Twitter for comment on these Khamenei tweets that Trump's FCC chair suddenly seems to care about. A spokesman directed me to guidelines that say “foreign policy saber-rattling on economic or military issues” generally does not violate its rules on “glorifying violence.” https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 433 |
@tedcruz |
text |
| 434 |
Of course not. They're anti-American and anti-Israel. From the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism. For Big Tech, that's a three-fer. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 435 |
Variety |
text |
| 436 |
As Twitter adds a warning to Trump's tweet advocating violence against Minneapolis protesters, so far Facebook and Instagram have left similar posts unchanged |
text |
| 437 |
CNET |
text |
| 438 |
The Verge |
text |
| 439 |
Philip Elmer‑DeWitt |
text |
| 440 |
@kreissdaniel |
text |
| 441 |
@realdonaldtrump |
text |
| 442 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 443 |
@sivavaid |
text |
| 444 |
@marechalphd |
text |
| 445 |
@dseetharaman |
text |
| 446 |
@nytimes |
text |
| 447 |
@tedcruz |
text |
| 448 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 449 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 450 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 451 |
@somebadideas |
text |
| 452 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 453 |
CNET |
text |
| 454 |
Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg and the fight for social media's soul — and survival |
text |
| 455 |
The Verge |
text |
| 456 |
Twitter isn't a government, but it's the best one we've got |
text |
| 457 |
Philip Elmer‑DeWitt |
text |
| 458 |
Trump vs. Twitter: The last word |
text |
| 459 |
@kreissdaniel |
text |
| 460 |
Don't let Zuckerberg peddle a ‘free speech’ line unchallenged. @Facebook DOES NOT have substantively different policies from @Twitter. It just doesn't enforce them. If Facebook was such a defender of free speech, why not let people speak anonymously or use pseudonyms? THREAD https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 461 |
@realdonaldtrump |
text |
| 462 |
.@Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is today criticizing Twitter. “We have a different policy than Twitter on this. I believe strongly that Facebook shouldn't be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online.” Did Twitter criticize Obama for his “you can keep your Dr.”? |
text |
| 463 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 464 |
These two May tweets will be studied for many years. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 465 |
@sivavaid |
text |
| 466 |
All this! PLUS remember that Facebook actively censors all sorts of political and religious expression around the world as various governments and political parties demand. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 467 |
@marechalphd |
text |
| 468 |
Policies are worthless if they're not fairly, evenly, and transparently enforced. Kudos to Twitter for (belatedly) doing the right thing, and shame on Facebook for repeatedly choosing to enable misinformation, hate speech and incitement to violence when politically convenient https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 469 |
@dseetharaman |
text |
| 470 |
Facebook and Twitter have similar rules, but diverge in their willingness to enforce them. This thread underscores some key points. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 471 |
@nytimes |
text |
| 472 |
President Trump's social media war is familiar. “A power user with a pa***ionate following is las***ng out against the moderators of his favorite internet services,” writes tech columnist @kevinroose. “He wants the mods to know who is really in charge.” https://www.nytimes.com/... |
text |
| 473 |
@tedcruz |
text |
| 474 |
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), in a letter Friday to the Justice and Treasury departments, is calling for a criminal investigation of Twitter over allegations the company is violating U.S. sanctions against Iran: https://www.axios.com/... |
text |
| 475 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 476 |
Speaking of which, let's get back to Facebook CEO. Rather than spend airtime arguing why he doesn't want to label the same post (this is his right), it would show actual leaders***p and spine if he made a statement focused on Twitter's same and equal right to do what it is doing. |
text |
| 477 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 478 |
Here is how it looks on Twitter's mobile app. This is significant. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 479 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 480 |
Twitter is showing leaders***p here. Make no mistake, this is not censors***p. They're a private platform and it's a label. Quite a contrast to the failed leaders***p at the top of Facebook (and its Instagram). https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 481 |
@somebadideas |
text |
| 482 |
I'll say this for twitter at least they're not Facebook, doubling down on its policy of allowing its platform to incite genocide like it did in Myanmar https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 483 |
@jason_kint |
text |
| 484 |
In sharp contrast, here is how same statement currently looks on Facebook and Instagram. Facebook's CEO went out strong yesterday across tv news claiming to differentiate his company in support of free speech. That's misleading as to what happens when adding a label. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 485 |
9to5Google |
text |
| 486 |
- |
image |
| 487 |
Google says it is delaying the Android 11 beta release and virtual launch event that was scheduled for June 3, but the final release is still on track for Q3 |
text |
| 488 |
Liliputing |
text |
| 489 |
Thurrott |
text |
| 490 |
Redmond Pie |
text |
| 491 |
BGR India |
text |
| 492 |
Android Authority |
text |
| 493 |
Huawei Central |
text |
| 494 |
Digital Trends |
text |
| 495 |
Droid Life |
text |
| 496 |
Gizchina |
text |
| 497 |
Android Central |
text |
| 498 |
Android Police |
text |
| 499 |
Pocketnow |
text |
| 500 |
Tom's Guide |
text |
| 501 |
The Verge |
text |
| 502 |
TechRadar.com |
text |
| 503 |
Neowin |
text |
| 504 |
@androiddev |
text |
| 505 |
@wongmjane |
text |
| 506 |
@zacsweers |
text |
| 507 |
@backlon |
text |
| 508 |
@technacity |
text |
| 509 |
Liliputing |
text |
| 510 |
Lilbits 5-30-2020: Android 11 beta postponed, WD sued for deceptive hard drives, and One GX pre-orders begin in China |
text |
| 511 |
Thurrott |
text |
| 512 |
Google Postpones Android 11 Beta Event |
text |
| 513 |
Redmond Pie |
text |
| 514 |
Google Postpones Android 11 Beta Launch, Likely In Light Of Civil Unrest |
text |
| 515 |
BGR India |
text |
| 516 |
Google delays Android 11 Beta launch event |
text |
| 517 |
Android Authority |
text |
| 518 |
Google postpones Android 11 event, beta release from June 3 |
text |
| 519 |
Huawei Central |
text |
| 520 |
Google postponed Android 11 launch show and beta release |
text |
| 521 |
Digital Trends |
text |
| 522 |
Google pushes back Android 11 beta release amid U.S. social unrest |
text |
| 523 |
Droid Life |
text |
| 524 |
Google Postpones Android 11 Beta Launch Event |
text |
| 525 |
Gizchina |
text |
| 526 |
Android 11 beta launch gets delayed |
text |
| 527 |
Android Central |
text |
| 528 |
Android 11 event and beta postponed: ‘Now is not the time to celebrate’ |
text |
| 529 |
Android Police |
text |
| 530 |
Google cancels Android 11 Beta launch event, citing protests around US |
text |
| 531 |
Pocketnow |
text |
| 532 |
Google delays Android 11 Beta Launch Show event scheduled for June 3 |
text |
| 533 |
Tom's Guide |
text |
| 534 |
Android 11 beta release event pushed back in light of US protests |
text |
| 535 |
The Verge |
text |
| 536 |
Google delays the Android 11 Beta announcement as protests roil US cities |
text |
| 537 |
TechRadar.com |
text |
| 538 |
Android 11 reveal delayed as Google pushes back its big event |
text |
| 539 |
Neowin |
text |
| 540 |
Android 11 beta launch event and release postponed from early next week |
text |
| 541 |
@androiddev |
text |
| 542 |
We are excited to tell you more about Android 11, but now is not the time to celebrate. We are postponing the June 3rd event and beta release. We'll be back with more on Android 11, soon. |
text |
| 543 |
@wongmjane |
text |
| 544 |
Good call, Google but what a cesspool of replies... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 545 |
@zacsweers |
text |
| 546 |
This is the right move. I don't think people realize how grim the next week is going to be here in the states. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 547 |
@backlon |
text |
| 548 |
Writing a blog post about this while listening to the sounds of flash bangs, teargas, fireworks, and yelling mere blocks away in Oakland is one of the more surreal professional experiences of my career. Please stay safe out there, everybody. https://www.theverge.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 549 |
@technacity |
text |
| 550 |
Financial Times |
text |
| 551 |
- |
image |
| 552 |
Sony says it is on track to launch PlayStation 5 this year and has begun manufacturing the console, announces a games-focused event on June 4 |
text |
| 553 |
GamesIndustry.biz |
text |
| 554 |
Eurogamer.net |
text |
| 555 |
PlayStation.Blog |
text |
| 556 |
Micky |
text |
| 557 |
CNET |
text |
| 558 |
BBC |
text |
| 559 |
CCN.com |
text |
| 560 |
Engadget |
text |
| 561 |
The Verge |
text |
| 562 |
Tom's Guide |
text |
| 563 |
GamingBolt |
text |
| 564 |
Laptop Mag |
text |
| 565 |
VentureBeat |
text |
| 566 |
Ubergizmo |
text |
| 567 |
TweakTown News |
text |
| 568 |
The Next Web |
text |
| 569 |
Stevivor |
text |
| 570 |
SlashGear |
text |
| 571 |
TechSpot |
text |
| 572 |
USgamer.net |
text |
| 573 |
TechCrunch |
text |
| 574 |
Dot Esports |
text |
| 575 |
Digital Trends |
text |
| 576 |
Game Rant |
text |
| 577 |
TechRadar.com |
text |
| 578 |
CNET |
text |
| 579 |
GameSpot |
text |
| 580 |
Thurrott |
text |
| 581 |
Wccftech |
text |
| 582 |
Polygon |
text |
| 583 |
BGR India |
text |
| 584 |
VRFocus |
text |
| 585 |
Gizchina |
text |
| 586 |
OnMSFT.com |
text |
| 587 |
Ars Technica |
text |
| 588 |
Pocket-lint |
text |
| 589 |
MSPoweruser |
text |
| 590 |
Kotaku |
text |
| 591 |
BGR |
text |
| 592 |
Gamasutra |
text |
| 593 |
@nextgenplayer |
text |
| 594 |
@gibiz |
text |
| 595 |
@gibiz |
text |
| 596 |
@gibiz |
text |
| 597 |
@thisisfoxx |
text |
| 598 |
@corybarlog |
text |
| 599 |
@matpiscatella |
text |
| 600 |
@tim |
text |
| 601 |
@stevekovach |
text |
| 602 |
@jeffbakalar |
text |
| 603 |
@tomphillipseg |
text |
| 604 |
@kidsmoove |
text |
| 605 |
GamesIndustry.biz |
text |
| 606 |
Sony's Jim Ryan: “We are going to launch PS5 this holiday and we're going to launch globally” |
text |
| 607 |
Eurogamer.net |
text |
| 608 |
New PS4 games must also run on PlayStation 5 from July, Sony tells devs |
text |
| 609 |
PlayStation.Blog |
text |
| 610 |
You're Invited: A Look at the Future of Gaming on PlayStation 5 |
text |
| 611 |
Micky |
text |
| 612 |
Sony to offer best possible value proposition for the PS5 |
text |
| 613 |
CNET |
text |
| 614 |
PS5 event set for June 4, PlayStation CEO says supplies look good for launch |
text |
| 615 |
BBC |
text |
| 616 |
PlayStation 5: Sony confident coronavirus won't change release plans |
text |
| 617 |
CCN.com |
text |
| 618 |
Sony's Messaging on One Key PS5 Feature Is Confusing - And We Deserve Answers |
text |
| 619 |
Engadget |
text |
| 620 |
The Morning After: Why would anyone buy a $350 ‘anti-5G’ USB stick? |
text |
| 621 |
The Verge |
text |
| 622 |
Sony confirms PS5 will have exclusive games playable only on next-gen hardware |
text |
| 623 |
Tom's Guide |
text |
| 624 |
PS5 games will have a big disadvantage against Xbox Series X |
text |
| 625 |
GamingBolt |
text |
| 626 |
Bluepoint Technical Director Comments on PS5 Showcase - “It's Time to Push Forward” |
text |
| 627 |
Laptop Mag |
text |
| 628 |
PS5 DualSense controller reveal sparks debate: Is it Black or White? |
text |
| 629 |
VentureBeat |
text |
| 630 |
PlayStation 5 event confirmed: What to expect from the June 4 showcase |
text |
| 631 |
Ubergizmo |
text |
| 632 |
Sony Acknowledges That The PS5 Won't Necessarily Be Cheap |
text |
| 633 |
TweakTown News |
text |
| 634 |
Sony to support PS4 for ‘multiple years’ after PlayStation 5 launch |
text |
| 635 |
The Next Web |
text |
| 636 |
Xbox Series X will make old games look prettier |
text |
| 637 |
Stevivor |
text |
| 638 |
Sony requires devs to make PS4 games compatible with PS5 from July |
text |
| 639 |
SlashGear |
text |
| 640 |
Don't expect to see PlayStation 5 exclusives on PS4 |
text |
| 641 |
TechSpot |
text |
| 642 |
Sony to host PlayStation 5 games showcase on June 4 |
text |
| 643 |
USgamer.net |
text |
| 644 |
Xbox Throws Shade Over Who Believes in Generations |
text |
| 645 |
TechCrunch |
text |
| 646 |
Sony will show off the first PlayStation 5 games on June 4th |
text |
| 647 |
Dot Esports |
text |
| 648 |
Sony's CEO confirms PS5 will have console-exclusive games without backward compatibility |
text |
| 649 |
Digital Trends |
text |
| 650 |
How to watch Sony's PlayStation 5 event on June 4, and what to expect |
text |
| 651 |
Game Rant |
text |
| 652 |
PS5 Will Launch Everywhere at the Same Time | Game Rant |
text |
| 653 |
TechRadar.com |
text |
| 654 |
All new PS4 games have to work on PS5, orders Sony |
text |
| 655 |
CNET |
text |
| 656 |
Sony reportedly tells devs to make new PS4 games work on PS5 |
text |
| 657 |
GameSpot |
text |
| 658 |
Sony Confirms PS5 Event With Games And Gameplay For Early June |
text |
| 659 |
Thurrott |
text |
| 660 |
Sony Begins Manufacturing the PlayStation 5 |
text |
| 661 |
Wccftech |
text |
| 662 |
Sony Making Games That “Can Only be Enjoyed on PS5,” Xbox Crossgen Approach Not for Them |
text |
| 663 |
Polygon |
text |
| 664 |
Sony: PS5 games should show what next-gen is capable of |
text |
| 665 |
BGR India |
text |
| 666 |
Sony announces next PS5 event set to take place on June 4 |
text |
| 667 |
VRFocus |
text |
| 668 |
Sony to Hold PlayStation 5 Event on 4th June |
text |
| 669 |
Gizchina |
text |
| 670 |
Sony will reveal PS5 games on June 4, It's the first of many events for the next-gen console |
text |
| 671 |
OnMSFT.com |
text |
| 672 |
Sony to reveal next-gen PlayStation 5 games on June 4 |
text |
| 673 |
Ars Technica |
text |
| 674 |
“The future of gaming”: PlayStation 5 game reveal event dated for June 4 |
text |
| 675 |
Pocket-lint |
text |
| 676 |
How to watch the PS5 reveal event on 4 June 2020: The Future of Gaming livestream |
text |
| 677 |
MSPoweruser |
text |
| 678 |
Sony to hold PlayStation 5 reveal on June 4th; will show next-gen games |
text |
| 679 |
Kotaku |
text |
| 680 |
Sony Will Finally Show PlayStation 5 Games On June 4 |
text |
| 681 |
BGR |
text |
| 682 |
Sony announces PS5 digital showcase for June 4th |
text |
| 683 |
Gamasutra |
text |
| 684 |
Sony says after July 13th, new PS4 games must be PS5 compatible |
text |
| 685 |
@nextgenplayer |
text |
| 686 |
PS5 will focus on #exclusive games not available on PS4, this is the best news EVAH! 🔥 No old consoles to hold back the game quality. 👍 From the ground up day one exclusives built for PS5. 💯 It's #wonderful! 💥 https://www.gamesindustry.biz/ ... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 687 |
@gibiz |
text |
| 688 |
“We think there probably will be an increase in development budgets. We don't see it as being a ma***ive increase.” https://www.gamesindustry.biz/ ... |
text |
| 689 |
@gibiz |
text |
| 690 |
“Recent history has told us that gaming is one of the pastimes that benefits in economically difficult times” https://www.gamesindustry.biz/ ... |
text |
| 691 |
@gibiz |
text |
| 692 |
“We are going to launch PS5 this holiday and we're going to launch globally” https://www.gamesindustry.biz/ ... |
text |
| 693 |
@thisisfoxx |
text |
| 694 |
Wish list: - near instant load times - more efficient downloads - option for original PS1 boot sound https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 695 |
@corybarlog |
text |
| 696 |
Whoa, that's cool. I was wondering when this was gonna be. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 697 |
@matpiscatella |
text |
| 698 |
“Peak engagement really came in late March and through...April,” Mr Ryan said. “It is trending gently down as you would expect but it remains at very high levels.” Sony on track for PS5 launch despite supply-chain challenges https://www.ft.com/... via @financialtimes |
text |
| 699 |
@tim |
text |
| 700 |
Sony is on track for a full global launch of PlayStation5 in Q4 2020 as planned, SIE CEO Jim Ryan tells @FT, as it schedules the first PS5 software showcase for June 4th. We may even get to see the console itself next week https://www.ft.com/... |
text |
| 701 |
@stevekovach |
text |
| 702 |
Is Sony seriously going to hold another press conference for a new console and... not show the console? https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 703 |
@jeffbakalar |
text |
| 704 |
Sony is planning an event showcasing new PS5 games & gameplay for Thursday 6/4 at 4p ET. PlayStation CEO says “we remain absolutely on track” & PS5 supplies look good for launch. “We'll try to get the price right and value proposition right.” much more: https://www.cnet.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 705 |
@tomphillipseg |
text |
| 706 |
Sony has told PS4 developers they must ensure PlayStation 5 compatibility from July, and it's up to devs to make this work - just as it's up to of the devs of older games to ensure they sort back compat issues. Full story: https://www.eurogamer.net/... |
text |
| 707 |
@kidsmoove |
text |
| 708 |
d****. This means that technically Ghost & TLOU2. don't really have to be compatible with PS5 they have already been submitted for certification. So any game that is technically gold today or going gold in the next month don't have to work for PS5. But I expect TLOU & GHOST to be. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 709 |
Vox |
text |
| 710 |
- |
image |
| 711 |
Executives at big tech companies have publicly stayed silent on Trump's social media executive order, with many executives thinking it's really aimed at Twitter |
text |
| 712 |
Slate |
text |
| 713 |
NBC Bay Area |
text |
| 714 |
@mgsiegler |
text |
| 715 |
See also Mediagazer |
text |
| 716 |
Slate |
text |
| 717 |
The Trump-Twitter War Shows That Section 230 Can Work Beautifully |
text |
| 718 |
NBC Bay Area |
text |
| 719 |
Twitter and Trump: a Feud Years in the Making Finally Erupts |
text |
| 720 |
@mgsiegler |
text |
| 721 |
“If you're someone who would still like to see leaders stand up in public and denounce Bad Ideas on the record because it's important to oppose Bad Ideas before they become Pop****r Ideas — and I'm one of those — then this stance is disappointing.” https://www.vox.com/... |
text |
| 722 |
See also Mediagazer |
text |
| 723 |
Axios |
text |
| 724 |
Trump signs an EO designed to limit Section 230 protections by directing the Commerce Department to press the FCC to roll back portions of Section 230 |
text |
| 725 |
The Atlantic |
text |
| 726 |
Ars Technica |
text |
| 727 |
Was***ngton Post |
text |
| 728 |
New York Times |
text |
| 729 |
The Verge |
text |
| 730 |
The Verge |
text |
| 731 |
Wired |
text |
| 732 |
PCMag |
text |
| 733 |
Reason |
text |
| 734 |
Tubefilter |
text |
| 735 |
CNBC |
text |
| 736 |
U.S. Representative &h****ip; |
text |
| 737 |
Digital Trends |
text |
| 738 |
Techdirt |
text |
| 739 |
The Logic |
text |
| 740 |
CNN |
text |
| 741 |
Silicon Flatirons |
text |
| 742 |
Technology & &h****ip; |
text |
| 743 |
Slate |
text |
| 744 |
TheStreet |
text |
| 745 |
The Daily Dot |
text |
| 746 |
John McCarthy |
text |
| 747 |
@realdonaldtrump |
text |
| 748 |
@zeynep |
text |
| 749 |
@andersen |
text |
| 750 |
@laobserved |
text |
| 751 |
@ewerickson |
text |
| 752 |
@benedictevans |
text |
| 753 |
@mmasnick |
text |
| 754 |
@kevinbankston |
text |
| 755 |
@profcarroll |
text |
| 756 |
@hawleymo |
text |
| 757 |
@techdirt |
text |
| 758 |
@b_fung |
text |
| 759 |
@alecstapp |
text |
| 760 |
@byjacobward |
text |
| 761 |
@klonick |
text |
| 762 |
@kylegriffin1 |
text |
| 763 |
@brendancarrfcc |
text |
| 764 |
@hawleymo |
text |
| 765 |
@adamgoldmannyt |
text |
| 766 |
@davidgerard |
text |
| 767 |
@mtracey |
text |
| 768 |
@mikeofcc |
text |
| 769 |
@maggienyt |
text |
| 770 |
@theplumlinegs |
text |
| 771 |
@walshfreedom |
text |
| 772 |
@b_fung |
text |
| 773 |
@whitehouse |
text |
| 774 |
@charlescwcooke |
text |
| 775 |
@charlescwcooke |
text |
| 776 |
@ma_franks |
text |
| 777 |
@cillizzacnn |
text |
| 778 |
@tribelaw |
text |
| 779 |
@nxthompson |
text |
| 780 |
@marynmck |
text |
| 781 |
@karaswisher |
text |
| 782 |
@tiffanycli |
text |
| 783 |
@parscale |
text |
| 784 |
@digiphile |
text |
| 785 |
@jdrucker |
text |
| 786 |
@reuters |
text |
| 787 |
@awstar11 |
text |
| 788 |
@davidafrench |
text |
| 789 |
@fmanjoo |
text |
| 790 |
@superwuster |
text |
| 791 |
@theplumlinegs |
text |
| 792 |
@lpnational |
text |
| 793 |
See also Mediagazer |
text |
| 794 |
The Atlantic |
text |
| 795 |
Trump is unlikely to repeal Section 230, but threatens to in order to maintain the special treatment he receives from Facebook going into the 2020 election |
text |
| 796 |
Ars Technica |
text |
| 797 |
FCC Republican excitedly endorses Trump's crackdown on social media |
text |
| 798 |
Was***ngton Post |
text |
| 799 |
Twitter's decision to label Trump's tweets was two years in the making |
text |
| 800 |
New York Times |
text |
| 801 |
Twitter Adds Warnings to Trump and White House Tweets, Fueling Tensions |
text |
| 802 |
The Verge |
text |
| 803 |
Everything you need to know about Section 230 |
text |
| 804 |
The Verge |
text |
| 805 |
Let's go through Trump's terrible internet censors***p order, line by line |
text |
| 806 |
Wired |
text |
| 807 |
Trump's Executive Order Is the Most Futile Attack on 230 Yet |
text |
| 808 |
PCMag |
text |
| 809 |
Trump Launches All-Out Effort to Regulate Social Media Companies |
text |
| 810 |
Reason |
text |
| 811 |
Trump's Illegal, Impossible Plan to Teach Twitter a Lesson |
text |
| 812 |
Tubefilter |
text |
| 813 |
Trump's Executive Order Targeting Social Platforms Could Hurt “Internet Freedom,” Google Says |
text |
| 814 |
CNBC |
text |
| 815 |
Trump's threat to pull ‘billions’ in internet ad spending is exaggerated |
text |
| 816 |
U.S. Representative Jerry Nadler |
text |
| 817 |
Chairman Nadler Statement on Trump Executive Order Targeting Social Media Platforms |
text |
| 818 |
Digital Trends |
text |
| 819 |
Trump's executive order would hamstring U.S. innovation |
text |
| 820 |
Techdirt |
text |
| 821 |
No, Twitter Fact Checking The President Is Not Evidence Of Anti-Conservative Bias |
text |
| 822 |
The Logic |
text |
| 823 |
Trump's executive order targeting social media could complicate global efforts to regulate digital platforms |
text |
| 824 |
CNN |
text |
| 825 |
Twitter is now in completely uncharted waters |
text |
| 826 |
Silicon Flatirons |
text |
| 827 |
A Discussion with UN Special Rapporteur David Kaye on President Trump's “Executive Order &h****ip; |
text |
| 828 |
Technology & Marketing Law Blog |
text |
| 829 |
Trump's “Preventing Online Censors***p” Executive Order Is Pro-Censors***p Political Theater |
text |
| 830 |
Slate |
text |
| 831 |
Trump's a***ault on Twitter's Free Speech Should Disgust Supporters of Citizens United |
text |
| 832 |
TheStreet |
text |
| 833 |
Twitter Might Win Its Big Battle With Trump — For a Price |
text |
| 834 |
The Daily Dot |
text |
| 835 |
Trump-Twitter drama causes Cameron Winklevoss to get relentlessly owned |
text |
| 836 |
John McCarthy |
text |
| 837 |
President Donald J. Trump is ramping up his attacks against Twitter &h****ip; |
text |
| 838 |
@realdonaldtrump |
text |
| 839 |
This will be a Big Day for Social Media and FAIRNESS! |
text |
| 840 |
@zeynep |
text |
| 841 |
I keep seeing deep legal analyses of Trump's executive order on social media, wondering if it might hurt him and what Twitter might do. But hey, *look* over here. Trump's order has an audience of one: Mark Zuckerberg. And it's already working. New piece. https://www.theatlantic.com/ ... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 842 |
@andersen |
text |
| 843 |
Trump's rage tweets and his EO aren't about Twitter. They're a ref-working ploy aimed at Mark Zuckerberg. Trump is trying to make sure Zuck keeps Facebook's red carpet rolled all the way out for him. And his strategy is working. Read @zeynep: https://www.theatlantic.com/ ... |
text |
| 844 |
@laobserved |
text |
| 845 |
So Trump is pretending he wants Twitter to be made legally at risk for tweets by abusive users...like himself? When what he really wants is to get to say anything he wants. https://www.nytimes.com/... |
text |
| 846 |
@ewerickson |
text |
| 847 |
Y'all, I think Republicans are going down a very dangerous road trying to upend §230. They aren't thinking this through and are making emotional decisions with long term consequences that'll hamper their own free speech. |
text |
| 848 |
@benedictevans |
text |
| 849 |
Americans discussing how an American law might or might not affect the entire internet feels just a tiny bit 1990s. |
text |
| 850 |
@mmasnick |
text |
| 851 |
Please share our executive order on how evil social media is... on those social media platforms. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 852 |
@kevinbankston |
text |
| 853 |
Just since I haven't seen people saying this as much as they should in the context of the EO: the FCC Trump just asked to “clarify” that 230 requires political neutrality (it doesn't) is the same FCC that rolled back net neutrality rules for telecoms. In what universe... |
text |
| 854 |
@profcarroll |
text |
| 855 |
§230 expert admires the literary quality of the EO as “Ulysses-level giberish” and concludes it is the colossal waste of time and resouces we suspected it was designed for. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 856 |
@hawleymo |
text |
| 857 |
While we're on subject of @Google @YouTube censoring criticism of #ChineseCommunistParty and @Twitter's war with @realDonaldTrump, gotta remember that key to #BigTech dominance/monopoly is advertising, and how they have manip****ted S230 to create behavioral advertising machine |
text |
| 858 |
@techdirt |
text |
| 859 |
Trump's Final Executive Order On Social Media Deliberately Removed Reference To Importance Of Newspapers To Democracy https://www.techdirt.com/... |
text |
| 860 |
@b_fung |
text |
| 861 |
NEW: The White House did not consult the FCC on a forthcoming executive order pertaining to social media companies, according to a person briefed on the matter. This suggests the draft order has not gone through the normal interagency review process. |
text |
| 862 |
@alecstapp |
text |
| 863 |
If Trump's new executive order likely won't stand up to legal scrutiny, then what's the point? As @Popehat likes to say, “The process is the punishment.” https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 864 |
@byjacobward |
text |
| 865 |
Here's Trump's Executive Order. The gist of it is that it tries to strip social media platforms of protection under Section 230(c) when they “edit” content with labels like Twitter did to Trump's tweets today. https://kateklonick.com/... |
text |
| 866 |
@klonick |
text |
| 867 |
BREAKING Just got a draft copy of Trump's Executive Order on Social Media anonymously sent to my inbox. THREE TWEET SUMMARY: 1/ |
text |
| 868 |
@kylegriffin1 |
text |
| 869 |
The Chamber of Commerce, in an unusually pointed statement against Trump: “Regardless of the circ***stances that led up to this, this is not how public policy is made in the United States. An executive order cannot be properly used to change federal law.” https://www.nytimes.com/... |
text |
| 870 |
@brendancarrfcc |
text |
| 871 |
President Trump's Executive Order on Online Censorhsip is welcome news! I look forward to receiving the Administration's pet**ion for rulemaking and taking action. My statement: https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 872 |
@hawleymo |
text |
| 873 |
I will introduce legislation to end these special government giveaways. If @Twitter wants to editorialize & comment on users' posts, it should be divested of its special status under federal law (Section 230) & forced to play by same rules as all other publishers. Fair is fair |
text |
| 874 |
@adamgoldmannyt |
text |
| 875 |
Without a liability s***eld, they presumably would have to be more aggressive about policing messages that press the boundaries — like the president's. That, of course, is not the outcome Mr. Trump wants. https://www.nytimes.com/... @peterbakernyt |
text |
| 876 |
@davidgerard |
text |
| 877 |
“It's very much written in a way to make Trump's fans think he's done something to attack social media companies, but the deeper you dig, the more nothingness you find.” https://www.techdirt.com/... |
text |
| 878 |
@mtracey |
text |
| 879 |
I think Trump would be on solid ground if he were to argue that Twitter's incredibly stupid decision to append “fact-checks” to his tweets does const**ute traditional “publisher” activity, and therefore deprives Twitter of Section 230 protections https://www.reuters.com/... |
text |
| 880 |
@mikeofcc |
text |
| 881 |
Everyone take deep breath on EO, which I haven't seen. @realDonaldTrump has right to seek review of statute's application. As a conservative, I'm troubled voices are stifled by liberal tech leaders. At same time, I'm extremely dedicated to First Amendment which governs much here. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 882 |
@maggienyt |
text |
| 883 |
Unusually sharp Chamber of Commerce statement about the president's EO: “Regardless of the circ***stances that led up to this, this is not how public policy is made in the United States. An executive order cannot be properly used to change federal law.” https://www.nytimes.com/... |
text |
| 884 |
@theplumlinegs |
text |
| 885 |
This, from the executive order, completely unmasks what a laughable exercise in bad faith this whole thing really is. It's all about bullying social media companies into treating Trump's lies as truths, and truths about Trump's bottomless corruption as lies: https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 886 |
@walshfreedom |
text |
| 887 |
I wonder how Hannity would have reacted to President Obama saying he'd shut down Fox News if his lawyers could find a way to do it? https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 888 |
@b_fung |
text |
| 889 |
The FCC says it will “carefully review” any ask from the Trump administration for new rules. “This debate is an important one,” said @AjitPaiFCC in a statement. |
text |
| 890 |
@whitehouse |
text |
| 891 |
The Trump Administration is making sure your taxpayer dollars don't go to social media giants that unfairly repress free speech. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 892 |
@charlescwcooke |
text |
| 893 |
The order is about as pathetic as it is possible to get. It's based on a misunderstanding of the law, its instincts are rankly authoritarian, and, after all that, it doesn't actually do anything. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 894 |
@charlescwcooke |
text |
| 895 |
Just to be clear: The president can't take away statutory legal protections, and we shouldn't indulge the idea that he can. His job is to uphold the law, not negate it. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 896 |
@ma_franks |
text |
| 897 |
The text of the order is available now. It's exactly as opportunistic, const**utionally illiterate, Orwellian, and deliberately designed to distract from Trump's atrocities as one might expect. https://www.whitehouse.gov/... |
text |
| 898 |
@cillizzacnn |
text |
| 899 |
This isn't even an apples-and-oranges comparison. It's more like an apples-and-spaces***ps comparison. https://www.cnn.com/... |
text |
| 900 |
@tribelaw |
text |
| 901 |
If Trump's May 28 executive order were to end up restricting the ability of private social media platforms like Twitter to tag tweets like his as misleading, it would violate not just the Communications Decency Act (CDA) but the First Amendment. See this thread for my analysis: |
text |
| 902 |
@nxthompson |
text |
| 903 |
Trump's executive order is: A) Legal nonsense. B) Mainly an attempt to work the refs. C) Going to force everyone into a stupid debate about fixing the platforms, letting them thus avoid a real one https://www.wired.com/... |
text |
| 904 |
@marynmck |
text |
| 905 |
“ If the executive order was Trump's best shot, Twitter should feel relieved, not cowed. And the president could emerge looking weaker, not stronger.” @GiladEdelman examines the anti-social media executive order and finds out it's legislative cosplay. https://www.wired.com/... |
text |
| 906 |
@karaswisher |
text |
| 907 |
@antoniogm @WillOremus I am still for reform but not this gibberish by Matt Gaetz and all the grifters. This will ensure that tech never gets any smart, fair and substantive regulation for a long time |
text |
| 908 |
@tiffanycli |
text |
| 909 |
If I'm reading this correctly, the EO claims tech platforms are doing something they're not, in violation of an incorrect interpretation of law, and tasks agencies it can't task to look into the things that aren't being done that wouldn't be wrong. Anything I missed, @Klonick? https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 910 |
@parscale |
text |
| 911 |
Social media has been allowed to operate unchecked for years while protected by federal law. Silicon Valley giants now act as the arbiters of truth, censoring or labeling posts they disagree with, but they cannot be trusted to be honest and fair. https://www.donaldjtrump.com/ ... |
text |
| 912 |
@digiphile |
text |
| 913 |
@mmasnick Social media “bias” lawsuits keep failing in court: https://www.theverge.com/... Why? Judges are applying a widely accepted legal standard that this trumped up executive order doesn't change. |
text |
| 914 |
@jdrucker |
text |
| 915 |
If Joe Biden or Nancy Pelosi had proposed this, there would be no griping from the left. It's all about @realDonaldTrump's signature on the bottom of the executive order that makes it so heinous in their eyes. #TDS is real, folks. https://noqreport.com/... |
text |
| 916 |
@reuters |
text |
| 917 |
‘All they want is to not pay taxes’: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said social media platforms ‘pander to the White House’ https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 918 |
@awstar11 |
text |
| 919 |
When I see a tweet from Chuck Schumer or Nancy Pelosi get a fact check linking to the Heritage Foundation, then I'll believe that Twitter's checks are not political and only for the purpose of advocating for truth https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 920 |
@davidafrench |
text |
| 921 |
Trump can't lawfully repeal Section 230 by EO. Trump can't change Twitter speech policies by EO. The combination of Section 230 and the First Amendment dramatically limit his ability to regulate online speech. And we should all be thankful for those constraints. |
text |
| 922 |
@fmanjoo |
text |
| 923 |
you do not have a right to tweet. Nobody does. This is like saying you have a right to beat the final boss in Mario. You do not. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 924 |
@superwuster |
text |
| 925 |
We've come a long way when a Republican administration demands the FCC implement a fairness doctrine — how do Rush Limbaugh & Fox News do under a standard that demands representing all points of view? |
text |
| 926 |
@theplumlinegs |
text |
| 927 |
@GlennKesslerWP Something very fundamental is getting lost here. Trump has made it *explicit* that the new exec order is direct retribution for Twitter daring to fact check him. His *own words* tell us this. Even if nothing happens, that's a flagrant abuse of power: https://www.was***ngtonpost.com/ ... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 928 |
@lpnational |
text |
| 929 |
The executive order impacting social media #Section230 protections today has a chilling effect on free speech online. Private companies like @Twitter, @Facebook, @instagram, and @YouTube are just that - private. They have First Amendment rights too. https://www.axios.com/... |
text |
| 930 |
See also Mediagazer |
text |
| 931 |
The Verge |
text |
| 932 |
Biden campaign says he still wants to repeal Section 230, but emphasizes key differences from Trump's EO, like policies for more moderation, rather than less |
text |
| 933 |
@mmasnick |
text |
| 934 |
@skupor |
text |
| 935 |
@mmasnick |
text |
| 936 |
Here we have a great opportunity for @JoeBiden to take a stand for the 1st Amendment and an open and free internet. Instead... https://www.theverge.com/... |
text |
| 937 |
@skupor |
text |
| 938 |
Independent of your political views on 230, one thing is clear: Repealing 230 is likely to benefit the inc***bents at the expense of new businesses. Redux of Dodd-Frank for large money center banks + GDPR for large inc***bents - no one else can afford the costs of compliance. |
text |
| 939 |
Electronic Frontier Foundation |
text |
| 940 |
Trump EO misreads Section 230 by conflating two independent subsections and asking the FCC to link the two provisions together, despite previous rulings |
text |
| 941 |
Ars Technica |
text |
| 942 |
The Atlantic |
text |
| 943 |
Search Engine Journal |
text |
| 944 |
The Daily Dot |
text |
| 945 |
@tomf****on |
text |
| 946 |
@antonejohnson |
text |
| 947 |
@antonejohnson |
text |
| 948 |
@antonejohnson |
text |
| 949 |
@seldo |
text |
| 950 |
@charlie_savage |
text |
| 951 |
@tedlieu |
text |
| 952 |
@charlie_savage |
text |
| 953 |
Ars Technica |
text |
| 954 |
Trump is desperate to punish Big Tech but has no good way to do it |
text |
| 955 |
The Atlantic |
text |
| 956 |
The Utter Incoherence of Trump's Battle With Twitter |
text |
| 957 |
Search Engine Journal |
text |
| 958 |
Trump Executive Order May Target Blogs, Recipe Sites & Forums |
text |
| 959 |
The Daily Dot |
text |
| 960 |
Trump doesn't realize revoking Section 230 would get him kicked off the internet |
text |
| 961 |
@tomf****on |
text |
| 962 |
.@RealDonaldTrump's analysis of Section 230 is on target — I talk about @Twitter and Big Tech censors***p with @LouDobbs: https://www.youtube.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 963 |
@antonejohnson |
text |
| 964 |
And while some might argue that would be a good deterrent — outrage here seems to have FINALLY prodded the powers-that-be to do something — abolis***ng 230 would be like using a nuclear blast to kill a rat, immolating the whole community in the process. https://www.eff.org/... |
text |
| 965 |
@antonejohnson |
text |
| 966 |
ALL of them. Twitter, FB, YouTube, Insta, Reddit, LinkedIn, Craigslist, Snapchat, TikTok, you name it. Dead. Broke. Bankrupt. Because no matter how huge and profitable, no company can afford to defend or settle tens or hundreds of thousands of new lawsuits *per day*. /2 |
text |
| 967 |
@antonejohnson |
text |
| 968 |
To state the obvious, just put the shoe on the other foot. Consider Trump's 18,000+ lies. Repealing Section 230 would enable e.g. every @JoeNBC character (falsely accused of murder in 45's tweets) to sue *Twitter* as “publisher” of that despicable trash. /8 |
text |
| 969 |
@seldo |
text |
| 970 |
The EFF issues a thorough takedown of Trump's executive order on section 230, citing half a dozen recent precedents that make it unconst**utional. https://www.eff.org/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 971 |
@charlie_savage |
text |
| 972 |
Explainer on the few parts of the order that are not just rhetoric https://www.nytimes.com/... |
text |
| 973 |
@tedlieu |
text |
| 974 |
Dear @realDonaldTrump: Your Executive Order is a farce. The courts interpret Section 230, not @FCC. Your “US policy” doesn't matter if it conflicts with the statute or case law. That's why your EO calls for legislation, which is dead on arrival in @HouseJudiciary. Go pound sand. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 975 |
@charlie_savage |
text |
| 976 |
New legal explainer: cutting through the rhetoric and spin about what the Trump executive order targeting Twitter and other social media actually does, and why its central feature is probably a legal dud https://www.nytimes.com/... |
text |
| 977 |
Neustadt.fr |
text |
| 978 |
- |
image |
| 979 |
A look at the small and independent web, why it's different from the sites that dominate web traffic today, and why it's worth exploring |
text |
| 980 |
The Verge |
text |
| 981 |
- |
image |
| 982 |
Third-party Amazon sellers are marking products as “collectible” to get around price gouging rules; sellers say the loophole was rarely used before the pandemic |
text |
| 983 |
Slashdot |
text |
| 984 |
@joshdzieza |
text |
| 985 |
@reckless |
text |
| 986 |
@caseynewton |
text |
| 987 |
Slashdot |
text |
| 988 |
Amazon Sellers Are Marking Products As ‘Collectible’ To Get Around Price Gouging Rules |
text |
| 989 |
@joshdzieza |
text |
| 990 |
For sale on Amazon: thousand dollar “collectible” dumbbells and hot tubs. Sellers have figured out that labeling pretty much anything as collectible evades price-gouging algorithms. https://www.theverge.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 991 |
@reckless |
text |
| 992 |
Scoop from @joshdzieza: Amazon sellers are still price-gouging by marking common items as “collectibles” https://www.theverge.com/... |
text |
| 993 |
@caseynewton |
text |
| 994 |
I wondered why Amazon was selling adjustable dumbbells for $980. Turns out sellers are getting around price gouging measures by designating everyday items like Switch games and USB cables as “collectibles,” my colleague @joshdzieza reports https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 995 |
Wired |
text |
| 996 |
- |
image |
| 997 |
A behind-the-scenes account of how Kickstarter workers came together to become the first white-collar technology workforce to unionize in US history |
text |
| 998 |
Increment |
text |
| 999 |
- |
image |
| 1000 |
A look at the rise of React, an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces, which is led by a small team of full-time developers at Facebook |
text |
| 1001 |
Wall Street Journal |
text |
| 1002 |
- |
image |
| 1003 |
Comcast is spinning off Blockgraph, its cable TV ad-targeting service, to create a three-way joint venture with ViacomCBS and Charter Communications |
text |
| 1004 |
@bmorrissey |
text |
| 1005 |
@viacomcbs |
text |
| 1006 |
@dcnorg |
text |
| 1007 |
See also Mediagazer |
text |
| 1008 |
@bmorrissey |
text |
| 1009 |
The historical success rate of these media joint ventures has to be under 1%. https://www.wsj.com/... |
text |
| 1010 |
@viacomcbs |
text |
| 1011 |
Today, we announced an agreement with Comcast and Charter to take equal owners***p of #Blockgraph. The industry initiative creates a more secure way to use aggregated and anonymized data for highly targeted advertising. Read more via @WSJ. https://www.wsj.com/... |
text |
| 1012 |
@dcnorg |
text |
| 1013 |
Comcast is spinning off its Blockgraph unit and selling two-thirds to Charter Communications and ViacomCBS in an effort to give greater scale to ad buyers who want to target TV viewers. https://www.wsj.com/... via @WSJ |
text |
| 1014 |
See also Mediagazer |
text |
| 1015 |
Bloomberg |
text |
| 1016 |
- |
image |
| 1017 |
Analysis of Layoffs.fyi data: tech companies have cut over 40,000 jobs during the pandemic, led by the travel and transportation sector with 14,250 layoffs |
text |
| 1018 |
@ustechworkers |
text |
| 1019 |
@ustechworkers |
text |
| 1020 |
“The contracting labor practice allows tech companies to save money, appear leaner than dominant industries from decades past, and avoid scrutiny around hiring or layoffs.” https://www.was***ngtonpost.com/ ... |
text |
| 1021 |
Comcast is spinning off Blockgraph, its cable TV ad-targeting service, to create a three-way joint venture with ViacomCBS and Charter Communications |
text |
| 1022 |
Waymo to return its fleet to service in Bay Area starting June 8th delivering packages for two non-profits, thus sidestepping “shelter-in-place” regulations |
text |
| 1023 |
A look at the small and independent web, why it's different from the sites that dominate web traffic today, and why it's worth exploring |
text |
| 1024 |
A behind-the-scenes account of how Kickstarter workers came together to become the first white-collar technology workforce to unionize in US history |
text |
| 1025 |
A look at the rise of React, an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces, which is led by a small team of full-time developers at Facebook |
text |
| 1026 |
Google says it is delaying the Android 11 beta release and virtual launch event that was scheduled for June 3, but the final release is still on track for Q3 |
text |
| 1027 |
Stack Overflow's annual survey, taken by 65K+ developers: Rust remains most loved language at 86.1%, followed by TypeScript at 67.1%, Python dropped to third |
text |
| 1028 |
CNN crew released after being arrested while covering the Minneapolis protests; Omar Jimenez asked where to move to, but police said they didn't move when told |
text |
| 1029 |
A Fox News crew was hara***ed and chased out of Lafayette Park by protesters while covering the protests outside the White House |
text |
| 1030 |
American Society of Newsroom Editors pauses annual diversity survey to revise its approach; proposed changes include conducting a census of newsroom leaders***p |
text |
| 1031 |
Add to your calendar |
text |
| 1032 |
The Verge |
text |
| 1033 |
Waymo to return its fleet to service in Bay Area starting June 8th delivering packages for two non-profits, thus sidestepping “shelter-in-place” regulations |
text |
| 1034 |
TechRepublic |
text |
| 1035 |
Stack Overflow's annual survey, taken by 65K+ developers: Rust remains most loved language at 86.1%, followed by TypeScript at 67.1%, Python dropped to third |
text |
| 1036 |
ZDNet |
text |
| 1037 |
The New Stack |
text |
| 1038 |
ZDNet |
text |
| 1039 |
What do software developers want? A chance to learn, and a decent corporate culture |
text |
| 1040 |
The New Stack |
text |
| 1041 |
This Week in Programming: Rust Remains the Most Beloved Language |
text |
| 1042 |
The Atlantic |
text |
| 1043 |
Mutual aid groups across the US are organizing online via productivity tools like Airtable and Slack to exchange info, coordinate grocery distribution, and more |
text |
| 1044 |
@edavidpeterson |
text |
| 1045 |
@kait_tiffany |
text |
| 1046 |
@zoelle |
text |
| 1047 |
@theatlantic |
text |
| 1048 |
@edavidpeterson |
text |
| 1049 |
Best part of the job these past three months has been working with the 1000+ COVID-19 relief orgs that are leveraging Airtable to manage projects of awe-inspiring scale and impact. Great article covering just some of those projects from @kait_tiffany! https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1050 |
@kait_tiffany |
text |
| 1051 |
i wrote about how mutual aid organizers are co-opting productivity software and how they could change what it means to be “productive” https://www.theatlantic.com/ ... |
text |
| 1052 |
@zoelle |
text |
| 1053 |
Knowing we're helping 1000+ mutual aid orgs support their communities during the pandemic is honestly what's getting me through, y'all. And for what it's worth, it's exactly this - everyday people coming together to make amazing things happen - that gives me a little hope. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1054 |
@theatlantic |
text |
| 1055 |
Across the country, mutual-aid groups are using workplace chat apps and database tools—software designed to make money for companies—to give things away and donate time, @kait_tiffany reports: https://on.theatln.tc/7RFnfuA |
text |
| 1056 |
New York Times |
text |
| 1057 |
More questions loom for self-driving cars as the pandemic raises concerns over consumer hygiene tolerance in shared vehicles |
text |
| 1058 |
The Verge |
text |
| 1059 |
Interview with Kickstarter CEO Aziz Hasan on the future of crowdfunding and how the pandemic has impacted the number and types of projects on the site |
text |
| 1060 |
@ashleyrcarman |
text |
| 1061 |
@ashleyrcarman |
text |
| 1062 |
kickstarter laid off 40 percent of its workforce earlier this month, and then this week it hit a huge milestone: $5 billion in pledges. i spoke with the ceo about the future of the company and where crowdfunding even goes from here https://www.theverge.com/... |
text |
| 1063 |
Wall Street Journal |
text |
| 1064 |
Sources: Tencent is in talks to buy a $200M stake in Warner Music Group in advance of Warner's IPO; the offering is expected to value WMG around $11.7B- $13.3B |
text |
| 1065 |
Social Media Today |
text |
| 1066 |
Variety |
text |
| 1067 |
Music Business Worldwide |
text |
| 1068 |
Seeking Alpha |
text |
| 1069 |
Reuters |
text |
| 1070 |
@brianroemmele |
text |
| 1071 |
Social Media Today |
text |
| 1072 |
Chinese Tech Giant Tencent Seeks to Purchase a Stake in Warner Music |
text |
| 1073 |
Variety |
text |
| 1074 |
Tencent in Talks to Acquire Stake in Warner Music: Report |
text |
| 1075 |
Music Business Worldwide |
text |
| 1076 |
Is Len Blavatnik about to complete the shrewdest deal in the history of the record business? |
text |
| 1077 |
Seeking Alpha |
text |
| 1078 |
Tencent discussing stake in Warner Music ahead of debut |
text |
| 1079 |
Reuters |
text |
| 1080 |
Tencent in talks to buy Warner Music stake: WSJ |
text |
| 1081 |
@brianroemmele |
text |
| 1082 |
This would be a ma***ive s***ft in music distribution if it plays out to the likely end point. Music mechanical music licensing will continue to shape subscription models. WMG has a ma***ive library and it is an astute investment. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1083 |
NBC News |
text |
| 1084 |
Facebook says it banned anti-vaccination news site Natural News for using content farms from Macedonia and the Philippines, not for the content it posted |
text |
| 1085 |
@fadiquran |
text |
| 1086 |
@dave_schilling |
text |
| 1087 |
@astoraaron |
text |
| 1088 |
@goldengateblond |
text |
| 1089 |
@noupside |
text |
| 1090 |
@arawnsley |
text |
| 1091 |
@edbott |
text |
| 1092 |
@oneunderscore__ |
text |
| 1093 |
@thekenyeung |
text |
| 1094 |
@fadiquran |
text |
| 1095 |
Avaaz has been monitoring and researching Natural News and other health misinformers over the last year. As we say in this article, Facebook needs to detox its algorithm. It also must be transparent with the millions of users exposed to this harmful content & send corrections. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1096 |
@dave_schilling |
text |
| 1097 |
When Mark Zuckerberg talks about “free speech,” he's misrepresenting what happens on his platform. The speech is only free if you pay to play. Troll farms don't line their pockets. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1098 |
@astoraaron |
text |
| 1099 |
I don't use Facebook much anymore, so I haven't seen this particular “Plandemic” video. But combine Macedonian troll farms with anti-vaxxers and, well, I'm glad they are disappearing. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1100 |
@goldengateblond |
text |
| 1101 |
oh I see so Facebook IS an arbiter of truth ... when it suits them https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1102 |
@noupside |
text |
| 1103 |
Natural News, banned in 2019, pushes content into Facebook Groups by way of hired accounts from Macedonia & the Philippines. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1104 |
@arawnsley |
text |
| 1105 |
Behind every big conspiracy theory is an even bigger money making scam https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1106 |
@edbott |
text |
| 1107 |
Wow, Zuckerberg is gonna be really p****ed off when he finds out that Facebook is interfering with people's free speech. https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1108 |
@oneunderscore__ |
text |
| 1109 |
Here's that story: One of the largest publishers of coronavirus disinformation on Facebook, including “Plandemic,” has been banned from the platform for using content farms from Macedonia and the Philippines. https://www.nbcnews.com/... |
text |
| 1110 |
@thekenyeung |
text |
| 1111 |
9to5Mac |
text |
| 1112 |
Apple announces Powerbeats Pro in four new colors: Spring Yellow, Cloud Pink, Lava Red, and Glacier Blue, available June 9 for $249 |
text |
| 1113 |
MacRumors |
text |
| 1114 |
MacRumors |
text |
| 1115 |
The Verge |
text |
| 1116 |
Wccftech |
text |
| 1117 |
Appleosophy |
text |
| 1118 |
iMore |
text |
| 1119 |
The Verge |
text |
| 1120 |
GEEKSPIN |
text |
| 1121 |
CNN |
text |
| 1122 |
AppleInsider |
text |
| 1123 |
Gizmodo |
text |
| 1124 |
Digital Trends |
text |
| 1125 |
iDownloadBlog.com |
text |
| 1126 |
Pocket-lint |
text |
| 1127 |
iPhone in Canada Blog |
text |
| 1128 |
@parkerortolani |
text |
| 1129 |
@chriswelch |
text |
| 1130 |
MacRumors |
text |
| 1131 |
Top Stories: macOS 10.15.5, New Powerbeats Pro Colors, iPhone 12 and 13 Rumors, and More |
text |
| 1132 |
MacRumors |
text |
| 1133 |
Powerbeats Pro Debut in Four New Colors: Spring Yellow, Cloud Pink, Lava Red, and Glacier Blue |
text |
| 1134 |
The Verge |
text |
| 1135 |
Beats confirms four new colors of Powerbeats Pro will launch on June 9th |
text |
| 1136 |
Wccftech |
text |
| 1137 |
Powerbeats Pro Will be Launching in June, 4 New Colors, Apple H1 Chip and Hey Siri Voice Command |
text |
| 1138 |
Appleosophy |
text |
| 1139 |
Powerbeats Pro coming in four new colors; available June 9 |
text |
| 1140 |
iMore |
text |
| 1141 |
First look at new Powerbeats Pro colors is here hours after announcement |
text |
| 1142 |
The Verge |
text |
| 1143 |
Apple comes out swinging against Tile after EU complaint |
text |
| 1144 |
GEEKSPIN |
text |
| 1145 |
Powerbeats Pro is now available in 4 new, bright colors |
text |
| 1146 |
CNN |
text |
| 1147 |
Powerbeats Pro are landing soon in yellow, pink, red and blue |
text |
| 1148 |
AppleInsider |
text |
| 1149 |
Beats announces four new bright Powerbeats Pro colors, coming June 9 |
text |
| 1150 |
Gizmodo |
text |
| 1151 |
The Best Pair of Workout Earbuds Now Comes in Actual Fun Colors |
text |
| 1152 |
Digital Trends |
text |
| 1153 |
Beat Powerbeats Pro adds four head-turning colors for more stylish workouts |
text |
| 1154 |
iDownloadBlog.com |
text |
| 1155 |
Powerbeats Pro in Spring Yellow, Cloud Pink, Glacier Blue, and Lava Red launch June 9 |
text |
| 1156 |
Pocket-lint |
text |
| 1157 |
New awesome Powerbeats Pro colours incoming, and they look great |
text |
| 1158 |
iPhone in Canada Blog |
text |
| 1159 |
First Hands-On Look at Powerbeats Pro in Yellow, Pink, Red, and Blue Colours |
text |
| 1160 |
@parkerortolani |
text |
| 1161 |
These are awesome. But they've gotta shrink that case. Wouldn't hurt to color match the case as well, not like they don't have the resources to do it. https://9to5mac.com/... |
text |
| 1162 |
@chriswelch |
text |
| 1163 |
I still like my Powerbeats Pro a lot. But I still occasionally run into issues where one earbud fails to charge. Nothing more frustrating with true wireless earbuds than turning them on to find one dead. Also, wireless charging case would be nice. https://www.theverge.com/... |
text |
| 1164 |
VentureBeat |
text |
| 1165 |
Amazon confirms Echo Look devices will stop working from July after pulling the Alexa-powered camera in Dec. 2019, offers discounts on Echo Show for Look users |
text |
| 1166 |
Voicebot.ai |
text |
| 1167 |
TechCrunch |
text |
| 1168 |
The Verge |
text |
| 1169 |
Ubergizmo |
text |
| 1170 |
Gizmodo |
text |
| 1171 |
PYMNTS.com |
text |
| 1172 |
CNET |
text |
| 1173 |
Android Police |
text |
| 1174 |
MSPoweruser |
text |
| 1175 |
Input |
text |
| 1176 |
TechHive |
text |
| 1177 |
Voicebot.ai |
text |
| 1178 |
Amazon Echo Look No More - Another Alexa Device Discontinued |
text |
| 1179 |
TechCrunch |
text |
| 1180 |
Echo Looks will cease functioning in July, as Amazon discontinues the camera |
text |
| 1181 |
The Verge |
text |
| 1182 |
Amazon will no longer support the Echo Look, encourages owners to recycle theirs |
text |
| 1183 |
Ubergizmo |
text |
| 1184 |
Amazon Echo Look WIll Be Shutting Down This July |
text |
| 1185 |
Gizmodo |
text |
| 1186 |
RIP Echo Look, Another Amazon Device I Never Even Knew Existed Until Today |
text |
| 1187 |
PYMNTS.com |
text |
| 1188 |
Echo Look Will ‘No Longer Function’ Starting In July |
text |
| 1189 |
CNET |
text |
| 1190 |
Amazon will shut down fas***on-focused Echo Look in July |
text |
| 1191 |
Android Police |
text |
| 1192 |
Amazon is killing its fas***on-oriented Echo Look |
text |
| 1193 |
MSPoweruser |
text |
| 1194 |
Amazon Echo Look discontinued: Turns out having a camera watch you dress was too creepy after all |
text |
| 1195 |
Input |
text |
| 1196 |
Amazon just killed its most hated Echo product |
text |
| 1197 |
TechHive |
text |
| 1198 |
Amazon's fas***on-centric Echo Look camera will stop working in July |
text |
| 1199 |
CNET |
text |
| 1200 |
Uber announces an hourly booking feature that lets people book trips for up to seven hours at a time, for $50 an hour |
text |
| 1201 |
Uber Newsroom |
text |
| 1202 |
The Rideshare Guy Blog &h****ip; |
text |
| 1203 |
TechRadar.com |
text |
| 1204 |
Mashable |
text |
| 1205 |
PYMNTS.com |
text |
| 1206 |
SlashGear |
text |
| 1207 |
SiliconANGLE |
text |
| 1208 |
The Mac Observer |
text |
| 1209 |
TechCrunch |
text |
| 1210 |
WTTW News |
text |
| 1211 |
@darakerr |
text |
| 1212 |
Uber Newsroom |
text |
| 1213 |
Do more by the hour: Expanding ride options with Hourly |
text |
| 1214 |
The Rideshare Guy Blog and Podcast |
text |
| 1215 |
Uber Announces New Hourly Rate for Trips: How Much Will Drivers See? |
text |
| 1216 |
TechRadar.com |
text |
| 1217 |
You can now hire Uber drivers by the hour in select US cities |
text |
| 1218 |
Mashable |
text |
| 1219 |
Uber Hourly is like having a personal driver — for an hour |
text |
| 1220 |
PYMNTS.com |
text |
| 1221 |
Uber Debuts $50 Hourly Ride Option In Select US Cities |
text |
| 1222 |
SlashGear |
text |
| 1223 |
Uber rolls out new Hourly ride order feature in some US cities |
text |
| 1224 |
SiliconANGLE |
text |
| 1225 |
Uber introduces Uber Hourly for long trips as it explores new revenue sources |
text |
| 1226 |
The Mac Observer |
text |
| 1227 |
Uber Launching Hourly Rate Ride Option in Some U.S. Cities |
text |
| 1228 |
TechCrunch |
text |
| 1229 |
Uber's latest feature lets riders book by the hour and make multiple stops |
text |
| 1230 |
WTTW News |
text |
| 1231 |
Uber Launches Rent-By-Hour Service as Demand for Ride-Hailing Services Drops |
text |
| 1232 |
@darakerr |
text |
| 1233 |
Uber is now letting people book rides on an hourly basis for running multiple errands. It's $50 per hour for up to 7 hours https://www.cnet.com/... |
text |
| 1234 |
TechCrunch |
text |
| 1235 |
Facebook's NPE launches Venue, a “second screen” app where selected well-known personalities will provide commentary and engage with fans during live events |
text |
| 1236 |
NPE Blog |
text |
| 1237 |
Inc42 Media |
text |
| 1238 |
SlashGear |
text |
| 1239 |
PYMNTS.com |
text |
| 1240 |
Adweek |
text |
| 1241 |
Social Media Today |
text |
| 1242 |
CNBC |
text |
| 1243 |
coinspeaker.com |
text |
| 1244 |
The Streamable |
text |
| 1245 |
CNET |
text |
| 1246 |
@nascar |
text |
| 1247 |
@officialssuna |
text |
| 1248 |
@yoda |
text |
| 1249 |
@walaytidegree |
text |
| 1250 |
@mgsiegler |
text |
| 1251 |
See also Mediagazer |
text |
| 1252 |
NPE Blog |
text |
| 1253 |
Introducing Venue - The Live Event Companion Experience |
text |
| 1254 |
Inc42 Media |
text |
| 1255 |
Daily Tech Briefing: Google Warns Of State-Backed Cyberattacks In India, Microsoft Backs IIT Solutions & More |
text |
| 1256 |
SlashGear |
text |
| 1257 |
Facebook's latest experiment is Venue, a second screen for live events |
text |
| 1258 |
PYMNTS.com |
text |
| 1259 |
Facebook Launches Venue As Live-Streaming Meets Post-Pandemic World |
text |
| 1260 |
Adweek |
text |
| 1261 |
Facebook NPE Team Releases 2 More Apps |
text |
| 1262 |
Social Media Today |
text |
| 1263 |
Facebook Launches Yet Another New App, This Time Focused on Live Event Engagement |
text |
| 1264 |
CNBC |
text |
| 1265 |
Facebook has new app that lets you chat about live sports — starting with NASCAR |
text |
| 1266 |
coinspeaker.com |
text |
| 1267 |
FB Stock Down 0.4% as Facebook Looks to Test New Live Commentary App Venue |
text |
| 1268 |
The Streamable |
text |
| 1269 |
How to Watch NASCAR's Supermarket Heroes 500 Race Live Without Cable on Roku, Amazon Fire TV and Apple TV |
text |
| 1270 |
CNET |
text |
| 1271 |
Facebook's new Venue app aims to connect fans, commentators during live events |
text |
| 1272 |
@nascar |
text |
| 1273 |
We're excited to announce that we've partnered with Facebook's NPE team to be the first sports partner on Venue, a new iOS and Android app that brings fans and expert commentators together to experience live races in a new interactive way. Learn more: https://www.nascar.com/... https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1274 |
@officialssuna |
text |
| 1275 |
NEW: I didn't want to publish about this new Facebook product before it's global launch, it's too cool to be ignored. Typical a Twitter concept👇 This is Venue, an app for live events. https://techcrunch.com/... |
text |
| 1276 |
@yoda |
text |
| 1277 |
oh so this is why Facebook threw Twitter under the bus? https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1278 |
@walaytidegree |
text |
| 1279 |
Just learned that Facebook has decided to compete against our business. Hows your day going? https://techcrunch.com/... |
text |
| 1280 |
@mgsiegler |
text |
| 1281 |
This one actually sounds clever/compelling https://techcrunch.com/... |
text |
| 1282 |
See also Mediagazer |
text |
| 1283 |
Social Media Today |
text |
| 1284 |
Zynn, a TikTok clone from ByteDance Chinese rival Kuaishou, pays users to watch videos and has now hit the top of the US iOS App Store following its May debut |
text |
| 1285 |
Mashable |
text |
| 1286 |
The Verge |
text |
| 1287 |
@oduneweniyi |
text |
| 1288 |
@sub8u |
text |
| 1289 |
@taylorlorenz |
text |
| 1290 |
Mashable |
text |
| 1291 |
This TikTok clone is number one on the App Store. But is it all smoke and mirrors? |
text |
| 1292 |
The Verge |
text |
| 1293 |
A new TikTok clone hit the top of the App Store by paying users to watch videos |
text |
| 1294 |
@oduneweniyi |
text |
| 1295 |
Zynn's key differentiator is essentially an in-built referral scheme. You can earn in-app rewards by watching videos on Zynn, and inviting friends to the app. The Rise of New Short-Form Video App Zynn Could Spell Trouble for TikTok https://www.socialmediatoday.com/ ... |
text |
| 1296 |
@sub8u |
text |
| 1297 |
What happens when you have an app that pays you to watch videos AND a pandemic where everyone is staying at home: https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1298 |
@taylorlorenz |
text |
| 1299 |
“Pays users to watch videos” https://twitter.com/... |
text |
| 1300 |
Mediagazer |
image |
| 1301 |
memeorandum |
image |
| 1302 |
WeSmirch |
image |
| 1303 |
Newsletter |
text |